Healthcare Professionals

Guidelines: Specific guidelines for treatment diabetic foot osteomyelitis

<<Back to guidelines
 
Based upon: The management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis -a progress report on diagnosing and a consensus on treating osteomyelitis-

Surgical procedures
Antibiotic regimens
Adjunctive treatments


The principle of treatment is to administer antibiotics while providing a local environment in which they can work. This typically involves the removal of dead soft tissue and accessible dead bone during the wound care process. These interventions may be undertaken by any appropriately trained healthcare provider.
  • Surgical procedures for removing necrotic and infected bone range from simple outpatient debridement to major amputation.
    • Urgent surgery is indicated for necrotising fasciitis, deep soft tissue abscess or gangrene accompanying osteomyelitis. All systemically unwell patients should be evaluated with these possible diagnoses in mind.
    • Non-urgent surgery may be necessary if there is significant compromise of the soft tissue envelope, loss of mechanical function or integrity of the foot, when the degree of bone involvement is likely to threaten life or limb, or where patient or provider wish to avoid prolonged antibiotic therapy.
    • Otherwise, surgical debridement of infected bone appears not to be necessary in some cases of diabetic foot osteomyelitis, though one cannot predict with certainty which patients will fail medical therapy.

  • Antibiotic regimens should be as targeted and narrow spectrum as possible. Bone culture and sensitivity results, if obtained, can assist in achieving this goal.
    • No specific agent has been shown to be most effective for osteomyelitis. Empiric regimens must include anti-staphylococcal coverage, with activity against methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA) according to local prevalence data.
    • Achieving adequate levels of antibiotics in the infected bone can be accomplished with intravenous therapy or highly bioavailable oral antibiotics. There are no data to indicate the superiority or inferiority of any particular route of delivery of systemic antibiotic for treating osteomyelitis. Available data are insufficient to assess the efficacy of locally administered antibiotics.
    • There are also no data to inform decisions on duration of antibiotic therapy. The scheme produced by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, which assesses the extent of residual soft tissue infection, bone infection and dead bone, and adjusts duration accordingly, appears to be useful.

  • Adjunctive treatments
    • Limb ischaemia considered critical or compromising of wound healing should be corrected through revascularisation procedures.
    • There is no evidence to support the use of hyperbaric oxygen G-CSF or larval therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

   Copyright 2011 DFWG  |  Website terms of use  |  Privacy Policy Admin Click here to visit E2